Open Government: Key Issues in Latvia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to find out how the management of Sedana Mekar BUMDes applies the principles of village autonomy in Mekarsari village, East Lore sub-district, Poso district. This research was conducted in the village of Mekarsari, East Lore sub-district, Poso district with the theory of village autonomy put forward by Sutoro Eko (2014), which is Impunity and Initiative. The research method uses qualitative with descriptive research type. The technique of determining informants used a purposive sampling technique with 6 informants. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of observation, interviews and documentation. The results of this study concluded that the implementation of the principles of village autonomy in the management of BUMDes Sedana Mekar in Mekarsari village was considered not optimal. This is based on aspects of Sutoro Eko's theory used in this study, namely the principle of impunity and initiatives in the management of BUMDes Sedana Mekar. Inadequate planning often occurs in BUMDes management so that the initiatives implemented are not optimal. And it is also found that there are irregularities in the principle of impunity, namely the appointment of BUMDes administrators from village officials which causes the village oversight function of BUMDes to become village oversight of itself.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Afandi, S. A., Afandi, M., & Anugerah, M. F. (2023). Open Government. Kediri: Kreator Cerdas Indonesia.
Afandi, S. A., Afandi, M., & Erdayani, R. (2022). Pengantar Teori Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Bintang Semesta Media.
Afandi, S. A., Afandi, M., Erdayani, R., & Afandi, N. H. (2023). Indonesia’s Open Government: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 3(1), 1–23.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(1), 285–296.
Erdayani, R., Afandi, M., & Afandi, S. A. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: A Study on The Open Government Partnership. Indo-Fintech Intellectuals: Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 85-103.
Gao, Y., Janssen, M., & Zhang, C. (2021). Understanding the Evolution of Open Government Data Research: Towards Open Data Sustainability and Smartness. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 10(2), 161–176.
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge Management: A Global Examination Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(12), 194–220.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483–502.
Ham, J., Koo, Y., & Lee, J. N. (2019). Provision and Usage of Open Government Data: Strategic Transformation Paths. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(8), 1841–1858.
Inga, V., & Edgars, B. (2020). Comparing Local Government Elections in Latvia and Other European Countries. Academic Journal, 13(3), 103–119.
Ingrams, A. (2020). Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness: A Popperian Review of Open Government. Administration and Society, 52(2), 319–340.
Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S., & Berliner, D. (2020). Learning from Our Mistakes: Public Management Reform and the Hope of Open Government. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(4), 257–272.
Kulsum, U., Nurmandi, A., Isnaini, Muallidin, Jafar, M., Loilatu, & Kurniawan, D. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 133–143.
Lnenicka, M., & Saxena, S. (2021). Re-Defining Open Government Data Standards for Smart Cities’ Websites: A Case Study of Selected Cities. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 23(4), 398–411.
Moon, M. J. (2020). Shifting from Old Open Government to New Open Government: Four Critical Dimensions and Case Illustrations. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(3), 535–559.
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software Tools for Conducting Bibliometric Analysis in Science: An Up-to-date Review. Multidisciplinar, 29(1), 629–635.
Nikiforova, A. (2021a). Open Data Quality Evaluation: A Comparative Analysis of Open Data in Latvia. Baltic J. Modern Computing, 6(4), 363–386.
Nikiforova, A. (2021b). Towards Enrichment of the Open Government Data: A Stakeholder-Centered Determination of High-Value Data Sets for Latvia. International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 367–372.
Prastya, D. E., Misran, & Nurmandi, A. (2021). A Bibliometric Analysis of E-Democracy on Government Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 20(2), 71–80.
Schmidthuber, L., & Hilgers, D. (2021). Trajectories of Local Open Government: An Empirical Investigation of Managerial and Political Perceptions. International Public Management Journal, 24(4), 537–561.
Skrastiņa, U., & Radzevičs, J. (2020). Legal Aspects of Open Government at the Local Level in Latvia. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 363–376.
Subedi, R., Nyamasvisva, T. E., & Pokharel, M. (2022). An Integrated-Based Framework For Open Government Data Adoption In Kathmandu. Webology, 19(2), 7936–7961.
Tai, K. T. (2021). Open government research over a decade: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 566-579.
Wang, V., & Shepherd, D. (2020). Exploring the Extent of Openness of Open Government Data – A Critique of Open Government Datasets in the UK. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 1035–1050.
Wirtz, B., Weyerer, J., & Rösch, M. (2019). Open Government and Citizen Participation: An Empirical Analysis of Citizen Expectancy towards Open Government Data. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 453–463.
Zulfa, R. G., & Afandi, S. A. (2023). Analisis Open Government Pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(2), 57–62.