Cultural Norm as Social Capital Indonesia's Democracy: A Case Study of Fufufafa Account

Desmalinda

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of the anonymous social media account Fufufafa as a distinctive case within Indonesian digital democracy. The controversy escalated rapidly because it was associated with the Vice President-Elect, marking the first instance in which an anonymous account targeted high-level political figures and triggered nationwide debate. Drone Emprit recorded over 112,000 interactions across platform X between 28 August and 18 September 2024. Using a qualitative approach supported by Social Media Network Analysis (SMNA), this study maps discourse networks, identifies influential actors, and analyzes dominant narratives. The findings show that civic participation was largely driven by anger and surprise, expressed through hashtags, retweets, and public commentary. These reflected moral dissatisfaction related to nepotism, ethical misconduct, and political integrity, demonstrating that cultural norms strongly shaped public reaction. Shared cultural norms regarding honesty, integrity, and accountability connected citizens, enabled collective moral judgments, and encouraged public scrutiny of political elites, thereby functioning as a form of digital social capital. While this norm-based participation expanded civic expression and decentralized political engagement, it also produced echo chambers that constrained inclusive deliberation. This study concludes that strengthening Indonesia’s digital democracy requires not only regulatory and literacy efforts but also the cultivation of cultural norms and ethical digital cultures that ensure the online sphere remains a deliberative arena for substantive democracy.

References

Assyofa, A. R., Rohandi, M. M. A., & Frendika, R. (2024). Analysis of personal values and work culture of Sundanese and Javanese employees (case study of employees in West Java). KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i24.16832
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, Reykjavík, Iceland. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/46515/
Dewi, P. A. R., Dharmawan, A., Aji, G. G., Winata, M. D., & Wahyuni, J. (2023). Mapping hoaxes, disinformation, and hate speeches in Indonesia. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 50(1), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v50i1.9943
Dwijatmoko, B. B. (2018). Honesty in Indonesian literature: Its social and cultural factors. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 18(4), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1804-07
Fahmi, I. (2024). Drone Emprit: Software for media monitoring and analytics. https://pers.droneemprit.id
Fensi, F. (2025). Hermeneutics of social media debates on identity politics from the perspective of communicative action. Bricolage: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 11(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v11i1.7133
Freelon, D., Marwick, A., & Kreiss, D. (2020). False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right. Science, 369(6508), 1197–1201. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2428
Gerbaudo, P. (2022). Theorizing reactive democracy. Democratic Theory, 9(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2022.090207
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.008
Hardiman, F. B. (2009). Demokrasi deliberatif: Menimbang "negara hukum" dan "ruang publik" dalam teori diskursus Jurgen Habermas. PT Kanisius.
Jha, C. K., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2018). Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277152
Jungherr, A. (2015). Analyzing political communication with digital trace data: The role of Twitter messages in social science research. Springer International Publishing.
Kreiss, D. (2021). Review of the book Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform, edited by N. Persily & J. A. Tucker. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220985078
Latapapua, F. E., & Handayani, P. (2019). The construction of anti-corruption values in Atuf Sang Penakluk Matahari from Maluku and Asal-usul Salatiga from Central Java: Intertextual approach. Proceeding of the International Conference on Literature.
Lee, Y. (2022). Social media capital and civic engagement: Does type of connection matter. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 19(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00300-8
Makulbayeva, G., & Sharipova, D. (2024). Social capital and performance of public councils in Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 16(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665241266260
Miller, V. (2020). Understanding digital culture. SAGE Publication.
Muhid, H. K. (2024, September 13). Polemik akun Fufufafa hina Prabowo terus bergulir, Menkominfo Budi Arie bersikukuh sebut bukan milik Gibran. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/politik
Nugroho, A. A. (2020). Effect of digital community towards democracy process: Digital participation analysis in Indonesia. Jurnal Good Governance, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.32834/gg.v15i2.123
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 357. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
Pyżalski, J. (2023). Positive internet use and online civic engagement versus active involvement in selected online risks: How are both connected in adolescents from six European countries. Psychology, Society & Education, 15(3), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.21071/pse.v15i3.16093
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Theocharis, Y., & van Deth, J. W. (2017). Political participation in a changing world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203728673
Tilly, C. (2019). Social movements, 1768–2004. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315632063
Trisetiawan, A. (2024, September 10). Gibran buka suara soal Kaskus "Fufufafa": Tanya yang punya akun. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/berita
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pnc1k7
Wendratama, E., Aprilia, M. P., Sari, Y. A., Kurnia, N., & Utomo, W. P. (2023). Domesticating WhatsApp groups: Indonesian women's experience with misinformation and hate speech in the 2019 election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3904-20

Authors

Desmalinda
desmalinda@uii.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Cultural Norm as Social Capital Indonesia’s Democracy: A Case Study of Fufufafa Account. (2026). Journal of Government Science (GovSci) : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.54144/govsci.v7i1.139

Article Details